Describe the companies you want and who you need inside them; your agent finds them, enriches the profiles and verifies the work emails, paying per lookup instead of per seat.
Eleven providers answer company search alone, and your agent sees what each one costs before it calls. Email verification has run 963 times at a 100% success rate.
| The old way | With treg | |
|---|---|---|
| What you pay for | Apollo $59/seat + Hunter $34/mo + Lusha $49/mo, and a credit pool that expires monthly | One prepaid balance. A found email is $0.0245, and a miss costs nothing |
| Keys | One account, one login and one API key per provider, spread across machines and .env files | One treg token. Every tool in the catalog answers to it |
| Picking a provider | You use whichever tool the team bought last year | catalog get lists all eleven company-search providers with price, measured success rate and median speed |
| Commitment | Seat minimums and annual contracts before you know whether the data covers your market | No subscription. Test the coverage for cents, then decide |
| The workflow | Export from the prospecting tool, paste into the enrichment tool, upload to the verifier, reconcile three CSVs | One agent run: find, enrich, verify, deduplicate — in one pass |
Paste this into the same agent. It installs the CLI, signs you in and registers the tools. One line, once — already set up? Skip to step 2.
set up treg — https://treg.to/llms.txt
Find 50 recently funded AI companies with 20–200 employees. Identify their head of growth or VP of marketing and verify their work email.
The agent finds the companies. catalog_search "search companies by size and funding" returns
eleven providers for that one job — and this is the sharpest price spread in the whole catalog:
| Provider | Cost per company | Success rate | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| free | 100% (248 calls) | 3.2 s | |
| free | 100% (24 calls) | 1.7 s | |
| $0.0019 | 100% (339 calls) | 0.3 s | |
| $0.004992 per 25 results | not yet measured | — | |
| $0.025 | 70% (10 calls) | 3.2 s | |
| $0.026 per page | not yet measured | — | |
| $0.0299 | 100% (5 calls) | 0.7 s | |
| $0.38 | not yet measured | — | |
| own key only | — | — |
Same job. A 200× spread, and the cheapest option is free. Coverage differs, which is exactly why the price is not the only column — but nobody should pay $0.38 a record without knowing $0.0019 was on the table.
It finds the people. Two routes, and the cheaper one is usually the right one. If you want everyone
at a company, hunter.companies.emails returns the known addresses at a domain in a single call —
100% success across 597 calls, 0.4 s median, the fastest endpoint in this whole workflow. If you want
one named person, hunter.people.email.find costs $0.0245 and only charges when it finds someone
(100% across 582 calls, 1.4 s). Enrichment fills thin profiles: Hunter $0.0245 (356 calls, 0.3 s),
Apollo $0.026 (263 calls, 0.3 s), LeadMagic $0.025, Coresignal $0.392.
It verifies before you send — and this is the step that matters most. Verification is the single most-called enrichment endpoint on treg.to: 963 calls at 100% success. It runs at $0.00625 with LeadMagic or $0.01225 with Hunter. Finding an address is cheap; sending to a dead one costs you a domain reputation, which is why the teams already doing this at volume verify more than they search.
50 companies · 20–200 employees · funded in the window · pulled [date] COMPANY SIZE LAST ROUND CONTACT TITLE EMAIL STATUS <company> 84 <round, date> <name> VP Marketing <email> verified <company> 142 <round, date> <name> Head of Growth <email> verified <company> 37 <round, date> <name> Head of Growth — no match ... SUMMARY 50 companies · 47 contacts identified · 41 emails verified · 6 no match COST $[from your run] (misses were not charged)
Structure is illustrative. Values come from the providers, relayed unchanged.
Run on treg.to, 17 Aug 2026. Every figure below is from the Activity log of that run.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Providers considered | 11 for company search, 3 for finding a work email |
| Providers selected | hunter.x.discover-companies (free) · hunter.people.email.find |
| Why | Discovery is free on Hunter and takes a plain-English brief. For the email, Hunter's finder carries one of the longest records in the catalog — 582 calls, 100% success, 1.4 s median — and it only charges when it finds one |
| Total cost of the run | $0.0245 — company discovery was free, one email was found and charged |
| Subscription cost avoided | $142/mo at list — Apollo $59/seat + Hunter $34 + Lusha $49 |
| Time to completion | Under 5 seconds across both calls |
| Data freshness | The address came back verified valid on 2026-08-17, sourced from a page last seen 2026-07-30 |
| Companies returned | 9, all matching "AI infrastructure, recently funded, 20–200 employees" |
| Emails found and verified | 1 of 1 attempted, confidence score 80 |
What the discovery call returned, for $0.00: nine companies with their domains and a count of known
addresses at each — Daloopa (223), ZincFive (64), Ethernovia (51), RunPod (33), AttoTude (19), Netris (17),
Bobyard (16), Normal Computing (9), Arycs Technologies (4). Hunter resolved the plain-English brief into
explicit filters and returned them: headcount bands 20-50 and 51-200, funding series pre-seed through
series C+.
One call in this run failed and cost nothing. A company-search request was rejected for sending a
boolean as a string — HTTP 400, $0.00 charged. Your parameter mistakes are free; only answers are billed.
The honest read of this run: one verified email is a demonstration, not a benchmark. Hunter's 100% over 582 calls is the measured success rate of the endpoint, not a promise that it finds every person you ask for. The number that matters for your list is the hit rate on your market, which is what the free tier is for — and misses cost nothing either way.
Test whether your ICP even exists at the size you assumed. Company search starts free, so you can check the market before anyone signs a contract for the data.
Point the agent at your existing CSV of names and domains. It fills in titles, company size and verified emails, and marks the rows it could not resolve rather than guessing.
Verify every address before it enters the sequence. At $0.00625 a check, verifying a 2,000-row list costs about $12.50 — and Hunter's finder does not charge you for the ones it cannot find.
Because this workflow is not one provider. Finding companies, identifying people and verifying email are three different products, and the vendor that is best at one is rarely best at the others — the table above is 200× wide for a single job. Holding accounts with all of them to find out is the expensive way to learn it. If you already pay for one, connect it and those calls route through your key, unmetered. treg.to is closer to OpenRouter for agent tools than to a data vendor: one base URL, one token, many providers behind it.
The credential is injected on the server. Your agent makes the real upstream request through treg.to's
/call/ endpoint; treg.to adds the key and relays the provider's answer back verbatim. No provider key
is ever written to your machine, your repo or your agent's context. Every call is recorded and attributed
to the token that made it.
Yes. Every endpoint has an id, and calling it by id calls that provider. If you want the choice made once
for the whole team, treg org pin <capability> --provider <provider> refuses calls to any other provider
of that capability.
(Often the right call here. Coverage varies by region and company size far more than it
varies by price, so once you find the provider that covers your market, pin it.)
Yes, and it takes precedence. Register the key once and every call to that provider routes through it — those calls are never metered against your treg.to balance. Your key always wins over treg.to's. (If your team already pays for Apollo or Hunter, this is the first thing to do. Those calls stop costing you anything on treg.to.)
treg.to does not silently reroute you. That is deliberate: only you know which inputs you actually hold,
so treg.to relays your request rather than rewriting it. What your agent gets instead is the information
to recover — it already knows the alternatives and their parameters, so on a 429, a 5xx or a timeout it
can try the next provider and tell you which one it switched to. Failed calls are not billed. If a call
succeeded upstream but the answer was lost coming back, an Idempotency-Key returns the stored result
without paying twice.
A found work email is $0.0245 with Hunter and a miss is free. Verification is $0.00625. Company search ranges from free to $0.38 a record depending on provider. The exact price is shown before the call, and treg.to adds no markup to what the provider charges. New teams start with $1.00 of free credit — enough for roughly 40 verified email lookups before you spend anything.
The installer registers treg.to's MCP server into Claude Code, Cursor and opencode automatically. Any MCP
client that supports the authorization spec can connect with OAuth. Anything that can run a shell command —
Codex included — can use the treg CLI or plain HTTP.
$1.00 of free credit on every new team. No credit card, no provider signup. treg.to is open source (AGPL).